The Kaduna governorship election petitions tribunal has upheld the victory of Uba Sani as the governor of the state.
The three-man panel via Zoom on Thursday affirmed Sani’s victory on “technical grounds”.
The panel in a two against one dissenting verdict ruled against the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate, Isah Ashiru, for premature filing of the application for pre-hearing.
The tribunal led by Victor Oviawie said the petition is thus considered abandoned as argued by Uba’s lawyers.
However, the tribunal dismissed Uba’s other objection that the petition itself was filed outside the legally allowed 21 days after the governorship election.
On the merit of the case, the tribunal held that if the petition had not been dismissed on technical grounds, it would have ordered a supplementary election in 22 polling units within 90 days.
The PDP and its candidate were challenging the declaration of Sani, candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), as winner of the March 18 governorship election.
The electoral umpire had declared that Sani secured 730, 001 votes to defeat his closest rival Ashiru of the PDP who scored 719, 196 votes.
Corroborating the ruling of the tribunal, Mohammed Lawal, one of the counsels of the PDP, admitted that the opposition party filed its pre-hearing late.
“What actually happened was that APC raised an objection about our pre-hearing petition that we filed out of time. But the position of the Electoral Act is that the tribunal must go into the nitty gritty,” Lawal said.
“Now they found that there is the need for rerun in 22 polling units in four LGAs.
“We cannot activate that as inconclusive unless we appeal against that decision that declared our petition abandoned. The final decision of the court has two arms, that is what confused people.
“One declared our petition as abandoned, the second decision declared the election inconclusive but, that inconclusive decision cannot be activated unless the decision declaring the petition abandoned is appealed against and set aside.
“So technically the tribunal declared the petition abandoned and dismissed it.”
THE CONFUSION
While the tribunal admitted that the PDP petition could have been successful on the merit of the case, it ruled that the pre-hearing was abandoned, which knocked it out technically.
Many had interpreted the explanation of the merit of the PDP’s case as the ruling declaring the election as inconclusive and calling for a rerun.
In a previous judgment, the supreme court had ruled that tribunals must determine the merit of a case even if it is going to be dismissed on technical grounds.
This is to avoid starting petition trial afresh in case the apex court eventually dismisses the technical grounds on appeal.
The Kaduna governor lauded the decision of the tribunal affirming his election.
In a statement, Sani said the judgment was an “unequivocal affirmation of the popular mandate given to him by the people”.
“I am extremely delighted and humbled by the ruling of the Election Petition Tribunal affirming my victory in the 2023 Kaduna State Governorship Elections,” the statement reads.
“I commend the tribunal for their thoroughness and lucidity. They have enriched our jurisprudence and practice of electoral democracy.”
WE’LL APPEAL, SAYS ASHIRU
The PDP candidate has said that the ruling would be appealed while appealing to his supporters to remain law-abiding.
Ashiru, in a statement, assured the people of Kaduna that he would pursue the mandate they gave him to its logical conclusion.
“Given the ruling of the Kaduna state election tribunal, it has become necessary to share with our teaming supporters, the true position of the ruling,” the statement reads.
“On the preliminary objection, the tribunal, based on the majority of 2:1 judges upheld the preliminary objection of the respondent to the effect that the application for pre-hearing was done prematurely i.e. before the service of the last set of petitioners’ reply to the 2nd respondent’s reply to the petition was served.
“However, the law enjoins the tribunal, as a trial court, to proceed to pronounce on the merit of the substantive suit so that in the event the court of appeal finds that the trial tribunal was wrong in its decision on the preliminary objection, it would have the benefit of pronouncing on the decision of the tribunal in the substantive matter.
“Accordingly, the trial tribunal finds merit in the aspect of the petitioner’s case relative to the margin of win between the two leading candidates.
“The tribunal by a split decision of 2:1 accordingly, nullified the election of the governor of Kaduna state, ordered that the Certificate of Return be retrieved and fresh elections be conducted in some polling units in 4 LGAs and the outcome thereof be reckoned with before the declaration of the winner of the governorship election in Kaduna state.
“I want to again thank the people of the state while urging them all to remain law abiding while we pursue the appeal process.”
Source: Top Stories
